Parshas VaYishlach – Echoing the Present in the Past

We are all well-aware of the fact there is no land as special as Eretz Yisrael, and as frequently fought over, as the Promised Land. This current, horrible embroilment is just the next step. Not surprisingly, there is something relevant to discover in this week’s parsha.

Parshas Vayishlach begins with Yaakov and his family returning to the Land and coming into confrontation with Esau and a cadre of 400 men. Although there is a great deal of tension and undercurrents, they part in peace – and while Esau invited Yaakov to be closer to him, Yaakov wisely knew that that was a dangerous path.

At the end of the parsha, when the Torah delineates Esau’s lineage, there is a pair of verses that state:

Esau took his wives, his sons and daughters, and all the members of his household, his cattle and all his livestock, and all the property that he had acquired in the land of Canaan, and went to another land because of his brother Jacob. For their possessions were too many for them to dwell together, and the land where they sojourned could not support them because of their livestock. (36:6-7)

This pasuk is strangely reminiscent of the incident that occurred with Avraham and Lot when they returned to the Eretz Canaan after going to Pharaoh’s court in Mitzrayim. Lot separates from Avraham, for their possessions had also become to great to sojourn in the land together.

The duality of Yitzchak/Yishmael and Yaakov/Esau is well known, but when one sees how Bereishis 36:7 reflects Bereishis 13, one realizes that Lot was Avraham’s contrast. Lot is not considered a forefather of any continuing civilization the way Yishmael and Esau are, but perhaps one could say that he was the forefather of an over-all collective of the self-serving who have no strong belief.

What is interesting here is to note that, in history, the descendants of Lot and the descendants of Esau moved away from their claim to the Promised Land. The descendants of Yishmael did not, just as Yishmael himself seems to have remained attached to Avraham and, one might presume, continued to hope for a portion of the Promised Land.

There is no take-away inspiring take away message here. There is only the fascination with the Torah’s continual revelation of history. And that theme continues on a totally different note when one looks at the story of Shechem.

It is almost frightening to point out that the story of the City of Shechem begins with the abduction and violation of Dena, an innocent young lady who went out to visit the local ladies. The king of Shechem, in collusion with his people, presented his violating son as a potential suitor, and the situation ends with Levy and Shimon murdering the men of the town. It seems like “disproportionate” violence, and Yaakov even reprimands them while noting his fear of the neighboring tribes’ reactions. The Torah sheh’ baal peh, the oral Torah, however, makes it quite clear that the entire city was happy to celebrate Shechem’s behavior and therein we know that there was a deep evil rooted here.

Again, there is no call to action in this Dvar Torah. There is only the fascinating information one can discover in the Torah and the inspiration that provides.

All reactions:

4Sherry Schwartz, Karen Saltzman and 2 others